Ground Trades Xchange - a landscaping forum

Go Back   Ground Trades Xchange - a landscaping forum > Landscape Services > Hardscaping
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2003, 10:10 PM
Gold Oak Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
USDA
Posts: 138
scott C is an unknown quantity at this point
Drain tile and srw's

How many use drain tile along with #1 stone behind srw walls? Do you install it with any pitch to allow for drainage? I have never read anything or seen pictures of drain tile behind walls laid with any type of pitch Am I missing something?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2003, 11:59 PM
Stonehenge's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wisconsin
USDA Zone 4
Posts: 7,566
Stonehenge is on a distinguished road
We install 4" corrugated perforated pipe behind walls all the time. As for pitch - we either keep it level or if there are step-ups, we pitch it toward where it daylights. Pitching it is not a requirement - as a guy who installed sewer pipe for a living told me - "you keep it level, the water will find where it's supposed to go."

I'm not familiar with #1 stone - if that's 3/4" clear, then that's what we use behind walls where we have perf pipe.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2003, 09:11 AM
agla's Avatar
Gold Oak Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cape Cod
USDA Zone 6
Posts: 1,325
agla is on a distinguished road
Perforated pipe takes water in only when the surrounding material is saturated.

When using perforated PVC (2 rows of holes), the idea is as the material saturates from the bottom up, it flows into the holes and into the channel between the two rows. The pipe should be pitched to carry that water away. This is best when you have water that you want to pick up and move a distance away. The pipe will not give up the water untill the end of the pipe or when there is more water in the pipe than that narrow channel can hold and the surrounding material is not already saturated. Sometimes you need to do this, but not always.

When using corrugated perforated pipe you have a much different situation. The surrounding soil must still be saturated in order for water to enter the pipe, but you have no channel. That means that as soon as the water in the pipe comes to an area that is not surrounded by saturated material it drains out of the perforations. The corrugation slows down the speed of the water further facilitating the bleeding out of the water. This piping is effective for evening out where the water is rather than taking it away. It is not very effective at quickly taking water away to an area where it can be managed unless the water is coming in at a fast pace. It more or less balances it out within the area of the pipe. Sometimes that is exactly what you want to do.
One danger is that the pipe can easily get ups and downs in it when simply tucked behind the bottom course of SRW's which renders it only useful as a holding area for water rather than a drainage system.
When laid level behind an SRW it is still largely relying on your base material to ultimately absorb the water. It does create a reservoir to let that happen over a greater time, though.

SRW's don't rely 100% on drainage pipe, but a combination of good drainage material for backfill and base, weeping seams between blocks, and drain pipe. I don't think that you have too much to worry about in how well pitched a perf pipe is behind one under normal circumstances. If it were a solid wall (like poured concrete), I would definitely use a pitched Perforated PVC pipe.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2003, 11:12 AM
jwholden's Avatar
Ranger
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southwest ct
USDA Zone 6
Posts: 1,743
jwholden is on a distinguished road
The perf. pipe is only for a worst case scenario. However, I like to pitch them. What happens if your backfill settles 1/2", the the whole purpose of the pipe is lost and the water may drain away from daylight.

I notice a lot of guys run the perf. pipe through the wall. I have never done this because I don't like the look of the pipe poking through. However, I also realize that doing it that way would be a HUGE time savings.

How do the vets go about running a pipe through a SRW. IE what course do you start on, what size pipe, what do you use to make the outlet 'Blend' with the wall.

Thanks,

JW
__________________
As a father I was always aware that I was raising my sons to leave home, marry, establish families, and be men who could stand on their own two feet. We must fulfill our own destiny. I really wasn't concerned about what they might 'do' but I wanted them to 'be' good men.
- David Epps

Last edited by jwholden : 11-08-2003 at 11:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2003, 12:17 PM
Ranger
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Chicago
USDA Zone 5
Posts: 1,558
Paul is on a distinguished road
We do it on some walls. Outlets are drilled out with a 5" core bit for 4" pipe. Some walls have to have it done, one location sea walls need to have it. We figure them for every 20'. Any time you get a high fluctuation of the water table you need to find ways to relieve water pressure, more correctly the difference in water pressure.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2003, 12:32 PM
Stonehenge's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wisconsin
USDA Zone 4
Posts: 7,566
Stonehenge is on a distinguished road
Agla, I think you make some good points about the weaknesses of using corrugated perf pipe. One thing I noted you mention that I know we don't do is rely on the base below the pipe to absorb the water. After we prep the base and lay the first course or two of block, we place backfill (usually clay) behind the wall, to at least the elevation of the finished grade at the face of the wall. I didn't think of this, this is what is recommended by Versa-Lok. The thought is it keeps water from getting to a place behind the wall where it can't easily escape.

Above that compacted backfill we place the pipe.

JW, I guess I've seen projects where the pipe is run out one end of the wall - to me that always looked a little clunky, and there are wall situations where that just wouldn't be possible. Daylighting through the wall is what is recommended in the Versa-Lok install manuals. We don't use a core bit like Paul mentions, but that would be a cleaner solution. The other solution I've seen is to use a nice steel or brass grill plate that is inserted in the square opening you cut in the block to daylight the pipe. Much sexier look.

As for the height of the daylight, I always place it as low as I can on the wall without going below the finished grade at the face of the wall. Where to place it along the length of the wall? Never where it meets a structure, but other than that, I place it wherever it makes the most sense for drainage purposes.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2003, 06:24 PM
agla's Avatar
Gold Oak Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cape Cod
USDA Zone 6
Posts: 1,325
agla is on a distinguished road
I don't think that corrugated pipe use is a weakness as long as you understand what it is doing. It is preferable sometimes and not so at other times. It clearly does something very different than PVC.

Know what you want to happen and use the techniques that will get you there.

Putting a layer of clay down stops water movement out the other side of the clay (down into the ground). That causes saturation in the clay and above it if there is enough water present. That will allow your pipe to pick it up but only because you are causing it to puddle there. If you go to that extreme to put water into the pipe, why would you want to let it work right back out by using corrugated? Why you want to stop it from leaching into the soil and to build up behind the wall under normal circumstances is beyond me, unless you have a steep slope below the wall.

Why create a surcharge? That clay will hold its water longer than anything else behind that wall. Depending on the type of clay it can act like a lubricant between two soil types. what is their reasoning to do this?

Leaching water effectively is ultimately what you want to do. Sometimes circumstances causes it to concentrate, then you move it to where you can manage it. If you have a huge effective leaching zone behind a wall, why interupt the use of it?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2003, 08:18 PM
Gold Oak Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
USDA
Posts: 138
scott C is an unknown quantity at this point
Agla good description of the use of pref. pipe behind srw walls. I have built quite a few walls both on my own and previous companies never fully understanding the layout of the pipe. I always assumed it was to be used as a relief valve for water that may get behind the wall. Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2003, 10:37 PM
Stonehenge's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wisconsin
USDA Zone 4
Posts: 7,566
Stonehenge is on a distinguished road
Agla, I'm not sure I understand how I'm preventing the water from leaching into the soil. And I guess moreover, I'm not sure why I'd want to let the water leach into the soil anyway, when I would think the preference would be for the water to exit from behind the wall ASAP, and exiting trhough the face or via pipe would seem the quickest. All of the soil around here is clay. So if I were to have total clear stone backfill behind the wall, top to bottom, the water would sit behind the embedded courses, and be subject to all kinds of freeze-thaw movement. The reasoning behind the clay cap over the base prep is to prevent water from getting there. The natural weep seams in the block, coupled with clear stone behind the wall will allow the water to escape the face of the wall; the pipe behind it is an added measure of safety.

Check out the Versa-Lok Tech Specs here: http://www.versa-lok.com/pdf/dni.pdf Page 7 shows a really good graphic of what I'm talking about.

Having clear stone all the way down would be the thing that creates the surcharge, as I can see it.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2003, 11:18 PM
Ranger
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Chicago
USDA Zone 5
Posts: 1,558
Paul is on a distinguished road
We need a "cap" to prevent water from entering the totop of the wall, this reduces pressure on the wall wall and keeps water behind the wall to a minimum. The clear stone keeps the movement of the soil directly behind the wall to a minimum.

There are times when we do want water behind the wall to move slowly, this is mostly when you can have water that tends to stay in the soils behind the wall. Here you can do away with the pipe and use the face of the wall as a weep type drainage. This prevents water from pushing out at one spot. Of course these walls should only be designed by a soils engineer.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-09-2003, 12:51 AM
Rex Mann's Avatar
Whip
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
USDA Zone 11
Posts: 325
Rex Mann is an unknown quantity at this point
We cap the clear drain stone with clay to help divert water away the rear of the wall. Putting clay on the base course to help divert or keep out water does not make sense to me. That clay will act as a cap when the frost, which is moisture in the spring, is coming out of the ground. As far as the drain goes, if it is 4-feet or higher we'll put in a drain and only if we can tie it into or create a drain system. I've never cut drains in the face of a wall, that is "old school" engineers and architects not knowing the difference between a solid wall and a SRW. We would use the corrugated perforated 4-inch with a sock when a drain was needed. The walls are segmental for a reason. For more information on SRW's Dr. Bathurst is the most respected in the business.http://www.rmc.ca/academic/civil/per...athurst_e.html

Peace,

Rex
__________________
Rex Mann

RM Stonescaping

Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-09-2003, 01:10 AM
Stonehenge's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wisconsin
USDA Zone 4
Posts: 7,566
Stonehenge is on a distinguished road
I guess allowing water to get behind the back side of a wall, below the finished grade at the face of the wall, with our clay soils (which will hold that water for a long, long time) does not make sense to me.

I found the install specs for Pisa, and they show what you and agla are speaking of (here - look at page 17: http://www.risistone.com/srw/install...tion_Guide.pdf ), but they don't show where that drainage pipe is going. Even so, it still does not make much sense to me to allow water to get to that depth.

I certainly don't claim to have all the answers...heck, I don't even have most. But I'm using specs put together by the engineers at Versa-Lok, and having not found a problem or failure for which this method was the cause, it works for me, so I'll continue to use it.

Rex, I'm curious where you daylight your drains, if not through the face of the wall.

I just browsed the report you linked - looks like a great lab he has for running tests. Do you have any links to reports that address the drainage/backfill issue as discussed here, or did I overlook it over there?

Last edited by Stonehenge : 11-09-2003 at 01:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 11-09-2003, 01:47 AM
Rex Mann's Avatar
Whip
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
USDA Zone 11
Posts: 325
Rex Mann is an unknown quantity at this point
Look a page 16 of the document you reference from Pisa 2.

What is the purpose of clear drain material behind a wall? Is it not to allow water to easily drain through it? Therefore, why not put the drain at the bottom of this layer of drainage material. That is where the water is going to end up.

Water follows the path of least resistance and gravity. With frost coming out of the ground coupled with hydrostatic pressure in the spring from the soil directly behind the wall the water is going to end up at the base of the wall. Therefore, if installing only one drain, it goes at this level.

"Not one engineering school in the US offers a specific class on SRW planning, design and specifications"

That is according to Versa-Lok in September 2003 issue of Landscape Contractor.

Agree to disagree?

Peace,

Rex
__________________
Rex Mann

RM Stonescaping

Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 11-09-2003, 01:55 AM
Stonehenge's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wisconsin
USDA Zone 4
Posts: 7,566
Stonehenge is on a distinguished road
I believe people of good conscience can do just that, and I know of none with greater quantity than you.



Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 11-09-2003, 08:47 AM
agla's Avatar
Gold Oak Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cape Cod
USDA Zone 6
Posts: 1,325
agla is on a distinguished road
What I did not realize was that your existing soil was all clay. When I read your post, it sounded like you were introducing clay as a new and separate material that would interupt leaching into the existing soil.

It now makes perfect sense to make a barrier to prevent it sitting in your base gravel since that would be the only place it could go (and stay). I see where you are coming from. You actually do want to force the issue of getting the water into the pipe.

I'm in a glacial outwash plane - spill a drink and there is no puddle. Most of our "soil" is medium to course sand. Here the drain tile is mostly to look like you did what you are supposed to and serves no real function. I swear at this sand as a growing medium, but it has its advantages too.

I would go with the pitched PVC in that clay to get that water out more efficiently. Pick it up and move it, don't redistribute it behind the wall if it won't leach.

Thanks for the explaination. I learn something on this board every day.

PS. Water also moves by capillary movement. Clay has the strongest capillary strength and will move water upward almost as fast as downward untill saturation when gravity completely takes over. When people say that clay sucks, they are right. It just does not do it fast and it won't give it up to a courser material on the other side of it. That is why the base gravel will get no water out of that clay.

Last edited by agla : 11-09-2003 at 08:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SRW's, a new I can't believe what I heard Bill Schwab Hardscaping 8 01-09-2005 05:47 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright ©2003-2007 Ground Trades Xchange, LLC