|
View Poll Results: Which Compactor
|
|
3k
|
 
|
8 |
50.00% |
|
5k
|
 
|
7 |
43.75% |
|
7k
|
 
|
1 |
6.25% |
| Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll |
 |
|

02-20-2007, 11:34 AM
|
 |
Sapling
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
USDA
Posts: 157
|
|
|
POLL: Compactor
What compactor are you guys using for res. patios ?
|

02-20-2007, 06:15 PM
|
 |
Gold Oak Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: South East Pa
USDA Zone 7
Posts: 391
|
|
|
Base compaction or setting?
__________________
Matt
|

02-20-2007, 10:09 PM
|
 |
Ranger
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southwest ct
USDA Zone 6
Posts: 1,743
|
|
|
I'm using a wacker with 3000 lbs compaction for 2-3 walks and patios a year. Had I known better I would have bought a reversible plate in the 5000 lb range to start.
__________________
As a father I was always aware that I was raising my sons to leave home, marry, establish families, and be men who could stand on their own two feet. We must fulfill our own destiny. I really wasn't concerned about what they might 'do' but I wanted them to 'be' good men.
- David Epps
|

02-21-2007, 08:40 AM
|
 |
Sapling
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
USDA
Posts: 157
|
|
|
That is my debate. ICPI states now that you have to have at least 5000# for the base. 3ooo# for setting. I use a wacker 1550 like most others, that has around 3500#.
|

02-21-2007, 10:13 AM
|
 |
Gold Oak Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: South Central Wisconsin
USDA Zone 4
Posts: 55
|
|
|
I use a DynaPac LF140 gives me 4725# of compaction yet is the same size as the 1550. It's a great machine.
|

02-21-2007, 08:20 PM
|
 |
Gold Oak Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
USDA
Posts: 49
|
|
|
I honestly don't see the need for such a large compactor for a patio or walkway. Raised patios, or vehicular applications I can see. A 4-6" base I think is no problem with a 3k compactor and water. If you really concerned I would just do smaller lifts. I honestly have never had a problem.
__________________
P. Aponte Landscape & Design, Inc.
"For All Your Landscape Needs, Satisfaction Guaranteed"
|

02-22-2007, 12:54 AM
|
 |
Seedling
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: St. louis mo
USDA Zone 5
Posts: 105
|
|
|
Can a bigger compactor (vibratory/rammer) really do 6 inch lifts? I've always been taught to do small lifts. I think small lifts are easier to work with, but I'd love to be able to get a base done quicker than small lifts.
__________________
Keith Neustaedter
St.louis Ponds and Waterfalls
"We bring life to your backyard"
|

02-22-2007, 08:55 AM
|
 |
Sapling
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
USDA
Posts: 157
|
|
|
Absolutly with a bigger compactor. There are some running on Ebay that have 600# of force that would easily do a 4" lift of aggregate for a great price. I am just concerned now that the ICPI states you must use a force of 5000# to compact. I do 2" lifts on my patios with a wacker 1550.
|

02-23-2007, 09:47 PM
|
|
Acorn
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
USDA
Posts: 2
|
|
|
We use the Wacker 2540. If you can afford it, I recommend it. It's reversible and hits at 5600 lbs. C.F.
I recommend it because you can save labor by installing 4"lifts if you like and you can still run it over the pavers to compact the bedding layer post paver install.
We use it on all the jobs we do from the smallest walkway to multi-tiered patios. We use it for subsoil compaction, base aggregate compaction and for compacting the bedding sand, post paver install.
We don't use it on driveways because we typically sub out the excavation and base install up to the final lift of two inches.
In my opinion, this size compactor is the most versatile and gives the biggest bang for the buck.
|

02-23-2007, 11:25 PM
|
 |
Seedling
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: St. louis mo
USDA Zone 5
Posts: 105
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by mbella
We don't use it on driveways because we typically sub out the excavation and base install up to the final lift of two inches.
|
Just curious how you finish the base. Small drives I'll do, but bigger drives I'll subout
Do you test the base before you finish the last 2 inches?
__________________
Keith Neustaedter
St.louis Ponds and Waterfalls
"We bring life to your backyard"
|

02-24-2007, 09:48 PM
|
|
Acorn
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
USDA
Posts: 2
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Keith N
Just curious how you finish the base. Small drives I'll do, but bigger drives I'll subout
Do you test the base before you finish the last 2 inches?
|
Keith, we don't test the base. My sub uses a Bomag single drum vibratory roller that hits at roughly 20,000lb. C.F. If we are installing 12 inches of base aggregate, I have him install two six inch lifts.
We've never had a problem with settlement.
|

02-24-2007, 11:02 PM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wisconsin
USDA Zone 4
Posts: 7,564
|
|
|
Something I haven't heard anyone talk about yet - soil types.
With the clay soils we have around here, I'm finally coming around to using a rammer anywhere near the foundation, because no plate compactor can do a similar job. I never would have thought it, but after seeing the 4" depression a small rammer left over an area where a 9,600# CF Bomag had been just before, my eyes were opened.
Then in checking around a bit, the civil engineering seems to corroborate it - use a rammer to pack clay soils.
|

02-24-2007, 11:19 PM
|
 |
Seedling
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: St. louis mo
USDA Zone 5
Posts: 105
|
|
|
Jeff, What type of compactor are you talking about? A vibratory/ramming plate or a jumping jack type compactor.
__________________
Keith Neustaedter
St.louis Ponds and Waterfalls
"We bring life to your backyard"
|

02-25-2007, 12:17 AM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wisconsin
USDA Zone 4
Posts: 7,564
|
|
|
Jumping jack.
|

02-26-2007, 08:37 AM
|
 |
Sapling
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
USDA
Posts: 157
|
|
|
Why only use the jumping jack near the foundation ? Instead of over the whole area ?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|